The Love is (not) impossible: a partial response to Darío Sztajnszrajber
Article Sidebar
Main Article Content
Abstract
The proposed article does not constitute a theoretical research. It is an imaginary dialogue between two Argentine philosophers belonging to antagonistic philo-sophical traditions on the possibility of love. The sections express moments of affirmation and response, that is, I first present Darío Z's ideas and then I try to complement his particular vision with my own. I trust that the outcome of this philosophical encounter will shed light on the reality of human love and its funda-mental importance for the fulfillment of our lives.
Article Details
Section
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 4.0 International License.
How to Cite
References
Comte-Sponville, A. (2001). La felicidad, desesperadamente. Paidós. La Biblia. (1995). El libro del pueblo de Dios. San Pablo.
Lewis, C. S. (1977). Cristianismo ¡Y nada más! Editorial Caribe.
MacIntyre, A. (2017). Ética en los conflictos de la modernidad. Sobre el deseo, el razonamiento práctico y la narrativa. Rialp.
Pascal, B. (2014). Pensamientos [Trad. R. Gómez Pérez]. Rialp. Sandel, M. (2000). El liberalismo y los límites de la justicia. Gedisa.
Scruton, R. (2010). Usos del Pesimismo. El peligro de la falsa esperanza. Ariel. Sztajnszrajber, D. (2023). El amor es imposible. Ocho tesis filosóficas. Paidós.